Everton Park Roof Inspection Report Purpose:
Provide a roof condition report to N.C.C 2016 Vol.2, AS 1562.1, AS 1562.3, SA HB 39 2015 The Installation Code for Metal Roofing and Walling and Manufacturer’s Instructions. Provide recommendations to extend longevity
Inspection Site Gallery
Findings & Recommendations In Everton Park Roof Inspection Report
- Ridge capping joints are not undersealed and have insufficient fasteners, noncompliant to SA HB39 refer 8.2 and 5.8.3 as shown. This will also reduce longevity as moisture from condensation gets trapped between the flashings leading to corrosion and future ingress.
- Evidence of previous repairs to the ridge cap flashings and fasteners in various areas using silicone, which has no longevity and breaks down under the sun’s UV rays, if not rectified this will lead to ingress.
- Evidence of previous repairs using a sheet patch and silicone which has no longevity, the sheet patch is lapped against the flow of water, is heavily reliant on silicone and is showing signs of deterioration, noncompliant to SA HB 39 refer 8.2 as shown.
- Eye bolt penetration is heavily reliant on silicone, which has no longevity and breaks down under the sun’s UV rays, non-compliant to SA HB39 refer 8.6.1 as shown above. All penetrations must be fitted with a synthetic Dektite as per manufacturer’s instructions.
- Numerous over tensioned roof screws/split neoprene washers have been identified and are showing signs of corrosion, these should be changed as soon as practically possible to stop the spread of corrosion. If not rectified may lead to ingress, noncompliant to SA HB39 refer 4.4.2 as shown.
- Evidence of minor foot traffic damage to the main roof, non-compliant to SA HB39 refer B6.5.1 as shown.
- Evidence of apron flashings, which are not undersealed and have insufficient fasteners, non-compliant to SA HB39 refer 8.2 and 5.8.3 as shown above in #1. This will also reduce longevity as moisture from condensation gets trapped between the flashings leading to corrosion and future ingress. Also apron flashings have not achieved the 150mm of effective coverage and a gap is present, if not rectified this will lead to ingress non-compliant to SA HB39 refer table 8.1.4 as shown.
- Anti-capillary features to all sheet laps have been compromised to the rear lower roof, non-compliant to AS 1562.1 refer appendix D, as shown below. This is resulting from a previous repair using silicone which has been applied to all roof sheet laps due to insufficient roof pitch. This is likely to trap in water and will lead to ingress. The pitch of the roof is approximately 2.8 degrees as shown. Corrugated profiles require a minimum pitch of 5-degrees as shown.
- Existing downpipe spreader, noncompliant to SA HB39 refer 5.7.7 as shown. Spreader to discharge all roof water onto roof coverings in the direction of flow. No half end caps have been provided.
- Evidence of previous repairs to the apron flashings using silicone, which has no longevity. Also, flashings joints have insufficient fasteners, non-compliant to SA HB39 refer 8.2 and 5.8.3 as shown above in #1.
- Parapet cap flashings shown with inadequate fall, non-compliant SA HB39 refer 8.7 as shown. Angle of fall shown is 0.2 degrees. Parapet cap flashing has not been provided with a minimum 3 degree fall towards the roof coverings. Also, parapet cap flashings have not been provided with external fasteners, non-compliant to AS 1562.1 refer 4.2 and SA HB39 refer 8.7 as shown.
- Evidence of pipe penetration which has been previously repaired, lapped against the flow of water, is heavily reliant on silicone and is showing signs of deterioration, non-compliant to SA HB 39 refer 8.2 and 8.6.1 as shown above in #4. All penetrations must be fitted with a synthetic Dektite as per manufacturer’s instructions. Also potential for future ponding, corrosion, and ingress. It would be beneficial to install a tray flashing to the apex with the Dektite in diamond formation on top to allow total drainage.
- Apron flashings have not achieved the 150mm of effective coverage, noncompliant to SA HB39 refer Table 8.1.4 as shown above in #7.
- Anti-capillary features to all sheet laps have been compromised to the right-hand side lower roof, non-compliant to AS 1562.1 refers to appendix D, as shown below. This is resulting from a previous repair using silicone which has been applied to all roof sheet laps due to insufficient roof pitch. This is likely to trap in water and will lead to ingress. The pitch of the roof is approximately 2.6 degrees as shown. Corrugated profiles require a minimum pitch of 5-degrees as shown below and above in #8. Evidence of previous repairs to the apron flashings using silicone, which has no longevity. Also, flashings joints have insufficient fasteners, non-compliant to SA HB39 refer 8.2 and 5.8.3 as shown above in #1.
- Parapet cap flashings shown with inadequate fall, non-compliant SA HB39 refer 8.7 as shown. Angle of fall shown is 0.2 degrees. Parapet cap flashing has not been provided with a minimum 3 degree fall towards the roof coverings. Also, parapet cap flashings have not been provided with external fasteners, non-compliant to AS 1562.1 refer 4.2 and SA HB39 refer 8.7 as shown above in #8.
- Existing downpipe spreader, noncompliant to SA HB39 refer 5.7.7 as shown above in #8. Spreader to discharge all roof water onto roof coverings in the direction of flow. No half end caps have been provided.
- Evidence of corroded roof sheet. This should be removed as soon as practically possible to prevent the spread of corrosion to the roofing materials.
Conclusion
There are non-compliance issues as noted in this report and it would be beneficial to rectify these to ensure the roof is compliant and increase longevity.